CHAPTER 2
Detection of Pesticide Residues in
Aquaculture Products
Prepared by
Ilda G. Borlongan, Ph. D.
Scientist II
Aquaculture Department
Southeast Asian Fisheries Development Center
Philippines
Agricultural chemicals such as fertilizers and pesticides have made an important contribution to agriculture. Pesticides protect crops from pests and diseases. They have brought about large yield increases, and have helped ensure that the rise in food production has kept well ahead of the rise in population. However, there is a growing concern about the safe use of these chemicals, and the potential dangers to farmers who use them, the environment, and consumers. There is particular concern about pesticides, since almost all chemicals that can kill pests are also potentially damaging to human health.
Legislation requires that pesticide use is appropriately controlled and maximum residue levels (MRLs) not be exceeded. The level of pesticide residues in food raw materials is a measurable standard. But while residue analysis is essential for companies wishing to assure themselves that their products have been produced in accordance with best practice and within the law, it can be used to greatest effect when targeted at samples most likely to contain residues.
Reliable residue analytical methods are necessary to measure the magnitude of residue in a seafood, and to enforce legal residue limits (tolerances). Sample preparation and extraction, clean up of extracts and pesticide detection are the main procedures in pesticide residue analysis. There is an interplay among these factors which should be considered in the choice of a particular method.
Determination of Pesticides Residue in Aquaculture Products
| The fish sample is scaled (if
scaly) and the head removed. Using a stainless knife, the flesh and
other edible portions are removed from the bone and entrails. These
edible portions are cut into small cubes or pieces and frozen until
analyses.
|
![]()
|
| Head and shells of tiger shrimp samples are removed and edible portions separated. These edible portions are cut into small cubes or pieces and frozen until analysed. |
![]()
|
Mollusks (oysters, clams and mussels) are shucked or de-shelled (snails)

Seaweed samples are chopped using a knife or cut into small pieces using a pair of scissors and frozen until analysed.and meat are separated and cut into small pieces and frozen until analysed.

The frozen samples are allowed
to thaw under room temperature and then ground in a meat chopper. The ground
samples are thoroughly mixed and
representative samples are taken for analysis.
The sample is blended with anhydrous sodium sulfate to disintegrate the solid and for it to combine with water in the sample. Fat is extracted from sample using petroleum ether. Extracts are purified by petroleum ether-acetonitrile partitioning, followed by chromatography on Florisil column. For some fractions, further clean up in Magnesia column may sometimes be needed. Pesticide residues in concentrated eluates are measured by gas chromatography.
| 1.
Weigh 25-50 g of thoroughly ground and mixed sample in a homogenizing beaker. Extraction |
![]()
|
| 2.
Homogenize the sample in high speed blender or homogenizer until thoroughly mixed. |
![]()
|
| 3.
Add 100 g anhydrous sodium sulfate (Na2 SO4) to combine with water and to disintegrate sample |
![]()
|
| 4.
Mix with a spatula and blender until well mixed. Scrape down the sides of blender jar and break up the caked material with a spatula. |
![]()
|
| 5.
Add 150 ml petroleum ether and blend at high speed for 2 min. |
![]()
|
| 6. Decant petroleum ether supernatant into a glassi fritted funnel with filter paper, into a 500 ml f lask fitted with a suction apparatus. |
![]()
|
| 7.
Extract residues in blender with two additional 100 mL portions of
petroleum ether, blending 2 min each time. 8. Decant petroleum ether supernatants through fritted funnel and combine with the first extract. 9. After last blending, transfer residue from blender jar to funnel, rinsing blender jar and materials in funnel with several small portions of petroleum ether.
|
|
|
10. Pour combined extracts and rinses into a column (25 mm x 50 mm long) of anhydrous Na2SO4 and collect the petroleum ether extract. |
![]()
|
|
11. Evaporate most of petroleum ether in a Kuderna-Danish concentrator. |
![]()
|
| 12. Transfer the fat solution to tared pear-shaped f lask using small amount of petroleum ether. | |
| 13.
Evaporate petroleum ether at steam bath temperature using a rotary evaporator to obtain fat. |
![]()
|
| 14.
When petroleum ether is completely removed, weigh and record weight of fat extracted. |
![]()
|
|
15. Take about 3 g fat for ether-acetonitrile
partitioning. 16. Record weight of fat taken for clean-up using the formula:
|
|
a.) Petroleum ether-Acetonitrile Partitioning
| 1.
Weigh about 3 g fat into a 125 mL separatory funnel.
|
![]() |
| 2.
Add 15 mL petroleum ether and 30 mL acetonitrile saturated with petroleum ether.
|
|
| 3.
Shake the funnel vigorously for 1 min and allow the layers to separate.
|
|
|
4. Drain the acetonitrile into a 1 L
separatory funnel containing 650 mL distilled H20, 40 mL saturated NaCl
solution, and 100 mL petroleum ether. Set aside. 5. Extract the petroleum ether layer in 125 mL separatory funnel with 3 additional 30 mL portions of acetonitrile saturated with petroleum ether, shaking vigorously 1 min each time and combine all extracts in the 1L separatory funnel. 6. Hold the 1 L separatory funnel in horizontal position and mix thoroughly for 30-45 sec. Allow the layers to separate and drain the aqueous layer into another 1 L separatory funnel. 7. Add 100 mL petroleum ether to the second 1 L separatory funnel, shake vigorously for 15 sec and allow the layers to separate. Discard the aqueous layer, combine petroleum ether extract with petroleum ether in the first separatory funnel and wash with two 100 mL portions of water. Discard the washing. 8. Drain the petroleum ether layer through a column (25 mm x 50 mm long) of anhydrous Na2SO4 into a 500 mL Kuderna-Danish concentrator. 9. Evaporate the extract to 5-10 mL in Kuderna-Danish concentrator and transfer the extract to a Florisil column. 1. Prepare a column (10 mm i. d. x 120 mm long) and fill it with 4 g activated Florisil topped with anhydrous Na2SO4. to about 2 cm. Prewet the column with 40-50 mL petroleum ether.
|
|
| 2.
Transfer the petroleum ether solution of sample extract to the column. Rinse the container with two, 5 mL portions of petroleum ether and transfer rinsings to column. |
![]()
|
|
3. Elute the column at about 5 mL/min with
200 mL of 6% ethyl ether/petroleum ether eluant. 4. Change the receiver and elute at about 5 mL/min with 200 mL of 15% ethyl ether/petroleum ether eluant. 5. Do step #4 again, this time using 50% ethyl ether/petroleum ether eluant. 6. Concentrate each eluate to a suitable definite volume (1-2 mL) in a Kuderna-Danish concentrator. 7. The concentrated eluate is now ready for injection into a gas chromatograph. Notes: The first eluate (6%) contains organochlorine pesticides (aldrin, BHC, DDE, DDD, o,p’- and p,p’-DDT, heptachlor, heptachlor epoxide, lindane, methoxychlor, mirex, and ethylan), industrial chemicals (polychlorinated biphenyls (PCB) and organophosphorus pesticides (ethion and ronnel) and is usually suitable for gas chromatography directly. The second eluate (15%) contains organochlorine pesticides (dieldrin and endrin) and organophosphorus pesticides (diazinon, methyl parathion and parathion). The third eluate (50%) contains organophosphorus pesticide (malathion).
|
|
(Applicable only to organochlorine pesticides in 15% eluate when additional clean-up is necessary).
| 1.
Transfer about 10 g Mg0 celite mixture to a chromatographic tube without stopcock and using the vacuum to pack. |
![]()
|
2. Pre-wash the column with about 40 mL petroleum
ether, discard pre-wash, and place a Kuderna-Danish concentrator under the
column.
3. Transfer the15% Florisil eluate which has been concentrated to about 5 mL, to
column, rinsing with small portions of petroleum ether.
4. Elute with 100 mL petroleum ether.
5. Concentrate the eluate to a suitable volume (1-2 ml). This is now ready for
injection into a gas chromatograph.
Detection and Quantitation by Gas Chromatography
Detection method is the process of identifying the pesticides and determining
their concentrations. With the aid of an analytical instrument, such as a gas
chromatograph (GC), we can obtain information about the original sample by
running a standard solution containing the pesticide(s) at a known concentration
and comparing it with the sample. In order for a sample to run through the GC,
the pesticide must be extracted from the sample into a high purity solvent. This
extracted portion is referred to as the sample extract. Upon entering the GC,
the extract is vaporized in a thermally controlled injection port. The vapor
containing the pesticide then passes into a temperature-and pressure controlled
oven within the GC where it is separated in the column. The vapor enters the
column and is eventually transported, with the help of a carrier gas, to a
thermally controlled detector which detects the pesticide as it f lows through
it. The time it takes for the pesticide to move through a column and reach the
detector is its retention time and the same pesticide will always have the same
retention time on the same column. All data transmitted from the detectors is
collected and stored on a computer which compiles the data into a chromatogram
as the GC is running.

Gas Chromatographic Conditions
Gas chromatograph Model: Shimadzu GC-17A,
equipped with 63Nielectron capture detector, attached to a CBM-102 Chromatopak
recorder system
Detector: Electron capture detector (ECD)
Column: SPB-608 (Supelco), Capillary (Fused
silica), 30m x 0.25mm I. D., 0.25 um film
Column Oven Temperature: 150o C (4 min) to 290o C at 8o C/min, hold 10 min.
Detector temperature: 300o C
Injector temperature: 220 o C
Carrier gas: Nitrogen (N2) at f low rate of 40 cm/sec
1. Study the operating manual of the gas
chromatograph available in your laboratory. Turn on and set the specified
chromatographic conditions.
2. Inject a suitable aliquot (3-8 uL) of concentrated eluate from Florisil or
MgO-celite column containing an amount of compound within the linear range into
the gas chromatograph.
3. Tentatively identify the residue peaks on basis of retention times.
4. Measure the area or height of residue peak(s) and determine the residue amount by comparison to peak area or height obtained from a known amount of appropriate reference material(s).
5. To ensure valid measurement of residue amount, the size of peaks from residue and reference standard should be within ± 25%.
6. Chromatograph reference material(s) immediately after samples.
Determination of pesticide residues in non-fatty samples
Principle
Non-fatty samples are blended with acetone and filtered. Extracts are
transferred from aqueous filtrate to organic phase by shaking with petroleum
ether and methylene chloride.
Calculation of Equivalent Sample Weight

Determination of Polychlorinated Biphenyl Residues
Determination of Carbamate Residues
Principle
The carbamate group of pesticide residues includes carbonolate, carbaryl (Sevin),
carbofuran, and propoxur (Baygon). The residue is extracted from the sample with
acetonitrile. The extract is purified by partitioning with petroleum ether and
coagulating in a H3PO4-NH4Cl solution. Phenolic impurities are largely
eliminated by partitioning CH2Cl2 extract with KOH solution. Carbamate residues
are treated with 1-f luoro-2,4-dinitrobenzene to form their corresponding
derivatives.
The recovery of each pesticide residue was determined by spiking tiger shrimp or fish muscle tissue with 0, 5, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 100, 150 and 200 ng/g of each pesticide standard, and extracting the samples as described previously. Each determination was replicated 5 times. The recoveries ranged from 75 to 99%. Precision, expressed as percentage relative standard deviation, was below 2.5%.
A method detection limit (MDL) was determined by running and analyzing a series of quality control samples (EPA STANDARDS, Spikes) to determine the lowest concentration of the pesticide that can be consistently and reliably measured using a given instrument. A spike is a standard containing the pesticide at a known concentration and goes through the entire extraction process like a real sample. Since spikes mimic real samples, we can measure the efficiency of the extraction method as well as the instrument performance and establish the (MDL) of the pesticide in various sample media. Laboratories should not report a pesticide at a concentration lower than the method detection limit.
An instrument detection limit (IDL) is determined by running a series of low level standards. The IDL gives us an idea of the lowest concentration of the pesticide residue that can be detected by the instrument. The IDL is consistently lower than the MDL because there is no extraction involved. We only use IDLs to monitor the instrument, but the IDLs have little relevance to the concentration of the actual sample extract.
The MDLs of 29 pesticide residues established using the methods described previously are summarized in the table next page:

(AOAC). Official Methods of Analysis. 1996. Sawyer, L. D., MacMahon, B. M., and Newsome, W. H. (Chapter eds.). Pesticides and Industrial Chemical Residues. 10:1-78.
AOAC International, 16th edition. Arlington, VA, U.S. A. Bertuzzi, P. F., Kamps, L. and Miles, C. I. 1967. Extraction of chlorinated pesticide residues from non-fatty samples of low moisture content. J. Assoc. Offic. Agr. Chemists. 50:623-627.
Cahill, W. P., Estesen, B. J., and Ware, G. W. 1970. A rapid on-column extraction clean-up method for animal fat. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 5: 70-71.
Carr, R. L. 1971. Collaborative study of a method for multiple chlorinated pesticide residues in fish. J. Assoc. Offic. Agr. Chemists. 54:525-527.
Jain, C. K. and Ali, I. 1997. Determination of pesticides in water, sediments, and soils by gas chromatography. Int. J. Environ. Anal. Chem. 68(1): 83-101.
Porter, M. L., Young, S. V. and Burke, J. A.
1970. A method for the analysis of fish, animal and poultry tissue for
chlorinated pesticide residues. J. Assoc. Offic.
Agr. Chemists. 50:644-645.